Counterparty name
Standard Parking Midway Joint Venture
Source cited · Page 2
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHICAGO (DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION) AND STANDARD PARKING MIDWAY JOINT VENTURE
Excerpa extracts critical contract information with clear, reviewable evidence from the original documents.
Get the sample workbookProfessional Services Agreement
City of Chicago · Department of Aviation
Standard Parking Midway Joint Venture
Source passage · Page 1
Dollar Amount of Contract (or maximum compensation if a Term Agreement) (DUR): $22,976,672.00
Public extraction sample. Excerpt view, not the original page layout.
The Excerpa difference
Contracts rarely arrive as one clean file. Keep the original, its amendments and the source behind each answer connected.
01 / A closer look
Start with the answer. Follow it to the passage. Decide what your team can accept and what still needs work.
Counterparty name
Source cited · Page 2
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHICAGO (DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION) AND STANDARD PARKING MIDWAY JOINT VENTURE
Contract value
Source cited · Page 1
Dollar Amount of Contract (or maximum compensation if a Term Agreement) (DUR): $22,976,672.00
This is extraction output, not an approved legal record. Citations help reviewers check the answers; they do not guarantee correctness.
Counterparty name
Source cited · Page 2
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHICAGO (DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION) AND STANDARD PARKING MIDWAY JOINT VENTURE
Contracting party
Source cited · Page 2
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHICAGO (DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION) AND STANDARD PARKING MIDWAY JOINT VENTURE
Contract type
Source cited · Page 2
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHICAGO (DEPARTMENT OF AVIATION) AND STANDARD PARKING MIDWAY JOINT VENTURE
Effective date
Source cited · Page 9
This Agreement takes effect as of January 1, 2008 ("Effective Date") and continues until December 31,-2010-or until this Agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms, whichever occurs first
Expiration date
Source cited · Page 9
This Agreement takes effect as of January 1, 2008 ("Effective Date") and continues until December 31,-2010-or until this Agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms, whichever occurs first
Execution date
Source cited · Page 10
Citation withheld: signature or notary block
Contract value
Source cited · Page 1
Dollar Amount of Contract (or maximum compensation if a Term Agreement) (DUR): $22,976,672.00
Currency
Source cited · Page 1
Dollar Amount of Contract (or maximum compensation if a Term Agreement) (DUR): $22,976,672.00
Governing law
Source cited · Page 9
This Agreement is govemed as to performance and interpretation in accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois Consultant irrevocably submits itself to the onginal jurisdiction of those courts located within the County of Cook, State of Illinois
Payment terms
Source cited · Page 10
Consultant will submit an estimated payment request ("Estimated Payment") for the costs it estimates it will incur in the following month, inclusive of the Management Fee The City will compensate Consultant on a monthly basis based on the Estimated Payment. As soon as practicable, but not to exceed thirty (30) days from the end of the month for which the Estimated Payment was submitted, Consultant must provide the Commissioner with a certified invoice
Termination rights
Source cited · Page 9
In addition to termination under Sections 8.01 and 8 02 of this Agreement, the City may terminate this Agreement, or all or any portion of the Services to be performed under it, at any time by a notice in wnting from the City to Consultant.
Notice period
Source cited · Page 9
The City may at any time request that Consultant suspend the Services, or any part of them, by giving 15 days prior written notice to Consultant or upon informal oral, or even no notice, in the event of emergency
Auto renewal clause
Source cited · Page 1
The Chief Procurement Officer may at any time before this Agreement expires elect to extend this Agreement for up to wo-(2)-additional years, under the same terms and conditions as this original Agreement, by notice in writing to Consultant After notification by the Chief Procurement Officer, this Agreement must be modified to reflect the lime extension without a wntlen Amendment signed by the Consultant and the City.
Amendment references
Source cited · Page 3
ADDENDUM NO. 1 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP) FOR MANAGEMENT OF PARKING AND GROUND TRANSPORTATION AT SERVICES FOR MIDWAY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT SPECIFICATIONS NO. 43496A
02 / The bigger picture
Amendments can change dates, values and obligations. The sample keeps each document visible so your team can review the whole family.
City of Chicago PO 16191 — Management of Parking and Ground Transportation Facilities, Midway International Airport. Original agreement plus its amendment chain, 2008 to 2012.
View the public source datasetA gap worth checking
The numbering gap stays visible. Missing documents are not silently filled in.
278 pages · Scanned, no text layer
3 pages · Born-digital text
term end 2009-12-31 -> 2010-12-31; value USD 22,976,672 -> USD 1.00 (unit cost per line item; total contract value not specified)
15 pages · Scanned, no text layer
value USD 1.00 (unit cost per line item; total contract value not specified) -> USD 34,877,187.00
104 pages · Scanned, no text layer
term end 2010-12-31 -> 2011-12-31; value USD 34,877,187.00 -> USD 47,291,789
87 pages · Scanned, no text layer
term end 2011-12-31 -> 2012-06-30; value USD 47,291,789 -> USD 53,022,500
rev 0
The agreement has an extension option exercisable at the Chief Procurement Officer's discretion before expiration, but no fixed renewal date is specified.
rev 1
This document is a modification summary and extension letter; no termination rights clauses are included in the excerpted text.
rev 1
No advance notice period for termination or non-renewal is specified in this modification summary or extension letter; the contract was extended by formal written notification.
rev 1
No auto-renewal language is present; the extension was executed via a formal modification letter and amendment process.
rev 1
The contract extension is explicitly defined through December 31, 2010 with no further renewal date specified.
rev 2
The amendment modifies budget and contract value but does not specify explicit payment terms such as Net 30 or invoice schedules; subcontractor payment timing (14 days after City payment) is referenced but this governs subcontractor payments, not the primary payment terms.
rev 2
The amendment does not include explicit termination rights provisions; it references the underlying Agreement for general terms and conditions not reproduced here.
rev 2
This is an amendment extending the agreement for a fixed one-year term through December 31, 2010; no auto-renewal language is present.
rev 2
The amendment establishes a fixed term ending December 31, 2010 with no renewal date specified beyond that extension.
rev 4
The amendment modifies budget amounts and encumbrance limits but does not specify explicit payment terms such as Net 30 or invoice schedules; payment terms may be defined in the underlying Agreement not reproduced here.
rev 4
The amendment explicitly sets a fixed end date of December 31, 2011 with no auto-renewal language; the agreement continues only until a new contract is awarded.
rev 4
No renewal date is specified; the agreement runs through December 31, 2011 or until a new contract is awarded, whichever occurs first, with no renewal provision.
rev 6
The amendment addresses budget increases and contract value caps but does not specify payment terms such as net days or invoice schedules for the amendment period.
rev 6
The amendment is a fixed-term extension through June 30, 2012 with no renewal date specified; the contract ends or transitions to a new agreement at that date.
03 / Take a closer look
Explore the full contract family at your own pace. Bring the sample to your legal, operations or implementation team.
Your contracts. Your acceptance criteria.
Planning a contract lifecycle management (CLM) migration? Tell Koho about your portfolio. We will review the fit and agree the scope of a paid benchmark before any work begins.
Start with context. No contract upload or purchase.
Yes. The sample uses City of Chicago PO 16191, a public airport services agreement and its amendments. It contains extraction output for review, not a customer accuracy claim.
Koho reviews your migration context and responds using the contact details you provide. Scope, pricing and a secure document transfer process are agreed before a benchmark begins.
Not necessarily. Document quality, fields and contract structure vary. A benchmark measures the agreed fields on your representative documents, including exceptions and review effort.